Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42491595›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Learning pathway determines motor organization and long-term retention of tool use in hornbills.

Elias Garcia-Pelegrin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Elias Garcia-PelegrinDepartment of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social learning is widely used to explain behavioral traditions, yet whether it determines their long-term stability remains unclear. This study tested this in hornbills learning a novel stone-dropping tool task by dissociating individual reinforcement from action-based demonstration by a human experimenter. Hornbills did not innovate after exposure to the solved outcome alone. Although both routes enabled acquisition, they generated different motor solutions and sharply different retention. Individually trained birds solved rapidly using push-based insertions, whereas socially trained birds learned more slowly and adopted grab-lift actions matching the demonstration. After 12 months, all socially trained birds retained the behavior, whereas none of the individually trained birds did. Observing organized action may therefore promote the consolidation of novel behavior into durable, tradition-like forms.

Indexed as

Biological sciencesNatural sciencesZoology

Identifiers

PMID42491595
PMCPMC13378258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.