Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42491579›Full record

ArticleBioscience2026

Insecticide regulations need to consider impacts on conservation adoption.

Tristan A Barley, Lisa A Schulte, Amy L Toth, Matthew O'Neal, Adam G Dolezal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tristan A BarleyDepartment of Entomology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 505 S. Goodwin Avenue, 320 Morrill Hall, M/C 118 Urbana, IL 61801,USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7429-7319
Lisa A SchulteNatural Resource Ecology and Management and Bioeconomy Institute, Iowa State University, 617 Bissel Road., 1140 Biorenewables Research Lab, Ames, IA 50011-1098, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4433-5008
Amy L TothEcology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, 251 Bessey Hall, 2200 Osborn Dr #251, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0824-0933
Matthew O'NealPlant Pathology, Entomology, and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Advanced Teaching and Research Building, 2213 Pammel Drive, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1642-6941
Adam G DolezalDepartment of Entomology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 505 S. Goodwin Avenue, 320 Morrill Hall, M/C 118 Urbana, IL 61801,USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6164-1344

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The US Environmental Protection Agency implemented a new insecticide strategy requiring site-specific changes to their use. An updated strategy was urgently needed, given the scientific evidence linking pesticides with precipitous declines in pollinators and increasing numbers of insects added to or proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act. Protecting nonpest insects requires all hands on deck; however, the new strategy threatens to undermine support from a key set of hands: farmers who use pesticides, and who are crucial partners for achieving conservation goals. Care should be taken to align the insecticide strategy with the USDA Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), a popular program that provides crucial financial support for farmland owners to voluntarily engage in conservation, including insect conservation. We spotlight the CRP Prairie Strips (CP-43) practice to exemplify problems with the new insecticide strategy and recommendations to improve the policy for both farmers and the environment.

Indexed as

conservationinsecticidespolicy

Identifiers

PMID42491579
PMCPMC13377639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.