ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
A qualitative study on emergency department nurses' experiences of coping with moral distress based on self-efficacy theory.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Grounded in Bandura's self-efficacy theory, this study aims to identify the key factors influencing how emergency department (ED) nurses cope with moral distress, providing an evidence base for targeted interventions to enhance their coping capacity and psychological well-being. Methods: A qualitative descriptive design was adopted. Between November and December 2025, 17 ED nurses from a tertiary general hospital were recruited through purposive sampling with maximum variation. One-to-one semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed using thematic framework analysis. To enhance trustworthiness, the data were independently coded by two researchers, and peer debriefing and an audit trail were employed. Results: Four main themes and 10 subthemes emerged from the analysis. ED nurses' coping self-efficacy is influenced by both personal confidence and the social context surrounding ethical decision-making. Participants described recurrent tensions between institutional rules and humanitarian care, triage dilemmas arising from staff and equipment shortages, and defensive practice following complaints, disciplinary action, or workplace violence. Self-efficacy was further influenced by the availability of collegial discussion, senior guidance, and managerial recognition, as well as by a perceived lack of empathy among peers. Nurses also reported that disgust, emotional exhaustion, and value conflict undermined their willingness and confidence to sustain care, whereas indirect exposure to colleagues' traumatic experiences reinforced self-protective boundaries. The most frequently reported subtheme was value conflict and emotional exhaustion (76.5%), followed by conflict between institutional mandates and humanitarian care, and triage dilemmas under resource scarcity. Conclusion: ED nurses' coping self-efficacy in the face of moral distress is socially situated and dynamically shaped by institutional constraints, resource scarcity, interpersonal interactions, emotional arousal, and exposure to traumatic clinical events. Interventions should move beyond individual-level coping training to address the organizational, relational, and ethical conditions of emergency care through context-sensitive support, mentorship, ethics training, and psychologically informed, team-based strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.