Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42491560›Full record

ArticleACS environmental Au2026

A Tutorial on Best Practices and Pitfalls in Applying Machine Learning to Environmental Research.

Zidong Yan, Jiaqi Li, Weican Zhang, Haonan Wen, Hao Yu, Miao Yu, Qian Liu, Guibin Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS environmental Au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zidong YanState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
Jiaqi LiState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
Weican ZhangState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8730-2778
Haonan WenState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
Hao YuState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
Miao YuThe Jackson Laboratory, 10 Discovery Drive, Farmington, Connecticut 06032, United States.
Qian LiuState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8525-7961
Guibin JiangState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6335-3917

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) has become a powerful paradigm for extracting structures from complex environmental data and supporting scientific inference across diverse subfields. Its potential, however, is often limited by gaps in the appropriate application of domain knowledge to machine-learning workflows, variability in data quality, and methodological choices that can distort model behavior or its interpretation. This Tutorial provides practical guidance on how domain expertise can be effectively integrated into the design of environmentally meaningful machine learning models and outlines a coherent workflow that integrates crucial stages, including data preprocessing, model development, evaluation, and interpretability. It also examines recurring pitfalls that arise along this pipeline and explains how they shape the credibility and reliability of machine-learning findings in environmental contexts. By consolidating these principles, this Tutorial aims to provide researchers with a clearer foundation for using machine learning in ways that are scientifically grounded, methodologically rigorous, and better aligned with the needs of environmental decision-making.

Indexed as

Causal machine learningDomain knowledgeEnvironmental decision-makingEnvironmental researchMachine learningMethodological pitfallsModel evaluationModeling workflowModel interpretability

Identifiers

PMID42491560
PMCPMC13377511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.