ArticleACS environmental Au2026
From Waste to Resource: Biosolids from Sludge Treatment Wetlands as Biofertilizers and Biostimulants.
Article in ACS environmental Au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research assessed biosolids from sludge treatment wetlands (STW) as possible biofertilizers, comparing them with digestate, compost, and microalgae biomass in greenhouse trials involving three crops (i.e., lettuce, radish, and ryegrass). Additionally, the potential biostimulant effects were evaluated through bioassays conducted under controlled conditions using water extracts of the biosolids. The biosolids showed a notable increase in radish growth compared with the unfertilized control, with increases of 93% and 95% in fresh and dry weight, respectively. The protein content of all crops grown under biosolids treatment was similar to that of microalgae, and it exceeded the control treatments by 6%, 9%, and 17% for lettuce, ryegrass, and radish, respectively. Furthermore, using biosolids reduced nutrient loss through leaching (i.e., N mineral forms), which was observed in urea treatments. Phytohormone-like bioassays revealed that biosolids extracts showed gibberellin-like activity, aiding seed germination and growth. Biosolids extracts also delayed senescence by slowing chlorophyll breakdown in wheat leaves and stimulated secondary root formation in bean seedlings. Overall, the results demonstrated the dual role of STWs' biosolids as biofertilizers and biostimulants, with performance comparable to urea and most of the biofertilizers used for comparison. Future studies should include field trials to confirm agronomic performance under real conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.