Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42491555›Full record

ArticleACS environmental Au2026

From Waste to Resource: Biosolids from Sludge Treatment Wetlands as Biofertilizers and Biostimulants.

Ana Cano-Larrotta, Luisa Massaccesi, Enrica Uggetti, Mirko Cucina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS environmental Au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana Cano-LarrottaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering (DECA), Group of Environmental Engineering and Microbiology (GEMMA), Barcelona School of Civil Engineering (ETSECCPB), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya-BarcelonaTech (UPC), Campus Nord, C. Jordi Girona 1-3, Building D1, E-08034 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2331-4910
Luisa MassaccesiNational Research Council of Italy, Institute for Agricultural and Forest Systems in the Mediterranean, Via della Madonna Alta 128, Perugia 06128, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5498-8291
Enrica UggettiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering (DECA), Group of Environmental Engineering and Microbiology (GEMMA), Barcelona School of Civil Engineering (ETSECCPB), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya-BarcelonaTech (UPC), Campus Nord, C. Jordi Girona 1-3, Building D1, E-08034 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6919-485X
Mirko CucinaNational Research Council of Italy, Institute for Agricultural and Forest Systems in the Mediterranean, Via della Madonna Alta 128, Perugia 06128, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7283-4122

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research assessed biosolids from sludge treatment wetlands (STW) as possible biofertilizers, comparing them with digestate, compost, and microalgae biomass in greenhouse trials involving three crops (i.e., lettuce, radish, and ryegrass). Additionally, the potential biostimulant effects were evaluated through bioassays conducted under controlled conditions using water extracts of the biosolids. The biosolids showed a notable increase in radish growth compared with the unfertilized control, with increases of 93% and 95% in fresh and dry weight, respectively. The protein content of all crops grown under biosolids treatment was similar to that of microalgae, and it exceeded the control treatments by 6%, 9%, and 17% for lettuce, ryegrass, and radish, respectively. Furthermore, using biosolids reduced nutrient loss through leaching (i.e., N mineral forms), which was observed in urea treatments. Phytohormone-like bioassays revealed that biosolids extracts showed gibberellin-like activity, aiding seed germination and growth. Biosolids extracts also delayed senescence by slowing chlorophyll breakdown in wheat leaves and stimulated secondary root formation in bean seedlings. Overall, the results demonstrated the dual role of STWs' biosolids as biofertilizers and biostimulants, with performance comparable to urea and most of the biofertilizers used for comparison. Future studies should include field trials to confirm agronomic performance under real conditions.

Indexed as

biosolidsbiostimulantnutrient leachingsludge treatment wetlandssoil fertilitywaste management

Identifiers

PMID42491555
PMCPMC13377512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.