Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42491548›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Teacher evaluation as a psychological work condition: professional feelings and occupational wellbeing among teachers in Chinese private higher education.

Yuda He, Jinghan Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuda HeAzman Hashim International Business School, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Jinghan SuAzman Hashim International Business School, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Teacher evaluation can operate not only as an administrative performance-management procedure but also as a psychological work condition. This study examined whether teachers' perceptions of evaluation were associated with occupational wellbeing through professional feelings. Methods: A cross-sectional self-report survey was conducted with 476 teachers from four private higher education institutions in Guangdong Province, China. Teacher evaluation was measured through perceptions of purpose, methods, indicators, content, feedback, and use of results. Reliability, factorability, correlations, regression models, and mediation analysis were examined in SPSS Statistics 26.0. Results: Perceived teacher evaluation was positively associated with occupational wellbeing. Evaluation content and feedback showed stronger associations with wellbeing than evaluation purpose. Professional feelings partially mediated the association between overall teacher evaluation and occupational wellbeing. Discussion: The findings suggest that evaluation systems are psychologically relevant when teachers interpret them as fair, comprehensive, feedback-rich, and recognition-oriented. The results extend organizational justice theory, self-determination theory, and the Job Demands-Resources model in a private higher education context.

Indexed as

job demands-resources modeloccupational wellbeingorganizational justiceprivate higher educationprofessional feelingsself-determination theoryteacher evaluation

Identifiers

PMID42491548
PMCPMC13377977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.