ArticleAACE endocrinology and diabetes
The Urinary Iodine Level Based on Different Duration of Low-Iodine Diet for Radioactive Iodine Therapy.
Article in AACE endocrinology and diabetes. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Objective: The optimal period of a low-iodine diet (LID) during preparation for radioactive iodine therapy (RAI) is not well established. At the University of Washington, we conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with a diagnosis of differentiated thyroid cancers who underwent total thyroidectomy and RAI during the period 2022-2024 and compared urine iodine concentration in patients who had either 1 or 2 week of LID prior to RAI. Case Report: All analyses were performed using SAS software 9.4 (SAS Institute). There were 72 patients who met the criteria. The median age of this cohort was 46 years (range: 19-82) and 63.9% were female. Of these, 53 patients underwent a 1-week and 19 patients underwent a 2-week LID before RAI. The median value of urine iodine after a 2-week restriction was lower at 0.228 μmol/L (29 μg/L) (range: <0.079-1.481 μmol/L; <10-188 μg/L) compared to 1 week at 0.362 μmol/L (46 μg/L) (range: <0.079-30.43 μmol/L; <10-3863 μg/L), but not statistically significant ( Discussion: Although the urine iodine level was lower in 2-week restriction, there was no statistically significant difference between 1 versus 2-week iodine restrictions following RAI. This suggests that a 1-week LID may be adequate for RAI treatment. This would decrease time to treatment for patients and decrease the burden of LID. Conclusion: There is a need for future large prospective randomized control trials to identify the optimal duration of LID and determine the goal urinary iodine level for successful RAI ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.