Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42491469›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026

From bond to guardianship: a serial mediation model explaining how the human-pet bond protects against pet relinquishment.

Huanhua Lu, Yawen Zhao, Zaina Jianaer, Xiaofei Xia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Huanhua LuSchool of Marxism, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing, China.
Yawen ZhaoSchool of Marxism, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing, China.
Zaina JianaerSchool of Marxism, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing, China.
Xiaofei XiaDepartment of Information Technology, Natural History Museum of China, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pet relinquishment is a major global animal welfare issue, yet the psychological mechanisms that protect against it remain insufficiently understood. Drawing on social bond theory and the cognitive-affective system framework, this study examined whether the human-pet bond influences attitudes toward pet relinquishment through a sequential cognitive-emotional pathway involving pet suffering perception and pet empathy. Methods: We first developed and validated a two-dimensional Pet Relinquishment Attitude Scale (PRAS), comprising relinquishment rationalization and responsibility commitment, tailored for collectivistic contexts. Survey data were collected from 444 pet owners. Correlation analyses and serial mediation analyses were conducted to test the proposed model. Results: A stronger human-pet bond was significantly associated with higher responsibility commitment ( Discussion: The findings suggest that the protective role of the human-pet bond operates through a cognitive-emotional mechanism involving both pet suffering perception and pet empathy. By identifying this pathway and introducing the PRAS as a culturally relevant measure of pet relinquishment attitudes, the study contributes to the literature on responsible pet ownership and provides practical implications for pet relinquishment prevention.

Indexed as

chain mediation analysishuman–pet bondpet empathypet relinquishmentpet suffering perceptionresponsibility commitment

Identifiers

PMID42491469
PMCPMC13377691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.