ArticleResuscitation plus2026
Translation and psychometric validation of the Intent-to-Aid survey for bystander response among French-speaking CPR-trained populations.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) use are critical determinants of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). These behaviors are influenced not only by knowledge and skills but also by affective determinants such as confidence, attitudes, and social norms. The Intent-to-Aid (I2A) survey was developed to measure these constructs. The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) has highlighted the need for tools to evaluate resuscitation education outcomes in non-English-speaking populations to support equitable access to training. Objective: To translate, culturally adapt, and psychometrically validate the I2A for French-speaking CPR-trained individuals. Methods: The I2A was translated using forward-backward procedures, expert review, and cognitive debriefing. In a cross-sectional study of French-speaking CPR-trained adults in Switzerland ( Results: The original four-factor structure (Attitudes, Norms, Confidence, Intentions) was replicated in parcel-based CFA, demonstrating excellent overall model fit. Item-level CFA supported the same structure after removing one item with extreme ceiling effects. Internal consistency ranged from acceptable to excellent ( Conclusions: The I2A-French demonstrates robust structural validity, satisfactory reliability, and theoretical coherence in highly trained CPR populations, supporting its use for evaluating affective determinants of bystander CPR response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.