ReviewOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026
Global status, bias risks, and ecological integration of wild bat and rodent virome research.
Review in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wild bats and rodents are critical zoonotic reservoirs. However, research limitations pose challenges for understanding virome dynamics and predicting emerging risks. Key issues include geographic biases (disproportionate sampling in Asia and North America vs. under-representation in Africa and Middle East) and taxonomic biases (overemphasis on accessible species over ecologically diverse hosts). Additionally, data fragmentation - stemming from inconsistent sequencing protocols and incomplete metadata - hampers comparative analyses. Crucially, most viral risk prediction models exclude ecological parameters (e.g., host behavior, climate), limiting their predictive accuracy. This review evaluates these knowledge gaps and methodological shortcomings, emphasizing the need for a coupled "virus-host-environment" framework. We propose actionable solutions: (i) establishing standardized transnational databases, (ii) strategically expanding surveillance in underrepresented regions, and (iii) integrating ecological variables. These steps will advance robust predictive modeling and enhance global emerging disease monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.