Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42491431›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Approaches to Ventral Hernia Repair: A Narrative Review.

Naren Kumar A, Chebolu Mahalakshmi Eswar, Gokul D Yatheendranathan, Sankar Gopi C

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Naren Kumar ADepartment of General Surgery, Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Chennai, IND.
Chebolu Mahalakshmi EswarDepartment of General Surgery, Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Chennai, IND.
Gokul D YatheendranathanDepartment of General Surgery, Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Chennai, IND.
Sankar Gopi CDepartment of General Surgery, Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ventral hernia repair is a significant and evolving challenge in general surgery, encompassing a wide spectrum of primary and incisional abdominal wall defects of varying complexity. The burden of ventral hernia continues to rise globally due to increasing rates of abdominal surgeries, aging populations, and the growing prevalence of risk factors such as obesity and metabolic disorders. Despite advances in surgical techniques, recurrence and postoperative complications remain important concerns, necessitating continuous refinement of management strategies. This narrative review synthesizes contemporary evidence on ventral hernia repair, focusing on mesh-based techniques, classification systems, patient optimization, and evolving surgical approaches. Mesh reinforcement remains the cornerstone of modern hernia repair, with strong evidence supporting the superiority of synthetic mesh over biologic mesh for recurrence outcomes, even in contaminated settings. Advances in mesh design, particularly the adoption of lightweight materials, have improved patient-reported outcomes by reducing chronic pain without compromising durability. Patient-related factors such as obesity significantly influence perioperative outcomes, highlighting the importance of individualized treatment strategies. The concept of loss of domain has emerged as a critical determinant of surgical complexity, with imaging-based volumetric assessment playing a key role in preoperative planning. Prehabilitation and multidisciplinary optimization have gained prominence as essential components of care. Evidence demonstrates that structured preoperative interventions, including exercise, nutritional support, and risk factor modification, reduce complications and improve recovery. Adjunct techniques such as botulinum toxin injection and progressive pneumoperitoneum further enhance outcomes in complex hernia repair by facilitating tension-free closure. Minimally invasive approaches, including laparoscopic and robotic techniques, have transformed ventral hernia surgery. Laparoscopic repair is associated with reduced wound complications and shorter hospital stays compared to open repair while maintaining similar recurrence rates. Robotic surgery offers additional technical advantages and improved short-term outcomes, although concerns regarding operative time and cost remain. Advanced techniques such as enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal repair and transversus abdominis release have expanded the surgical armamentarium for complex cases. Perioperative strategies continue to evolve, with emerging evidence questioning the routine use of surgical drains. Overall, ventral hernia repair has transitioned toward a patient-centered, evidence-based approach that integrates surgical innovation with perioperative optimization. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and personalized treatment strategies to further improve patient care.

Indexed as

hernialaparoscopymesh repairnarrative reviewventral hernia

Identifiers

PMID42491431
PMCPMC13377133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.