Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42491411›Full record

ArticlePlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)2026

Improved Cassava Varieties and Smallholder Farmers' Productivity and Welfare in Ghana: Insights From a Robust Impact Estimator Selection Approach.

Kodjo Kondo, Bright Owusu Asante, Omphile Temoso, Stephen Prah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kodjo KondoAGRA, CSIR Office Complex Accra Ghana.
Bright Owusu AsanteDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Agribusiness and Extension Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology Kumasi Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5415-6110
Omphile TemosoUNE Business School University of New England Armidale New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3327-0467
Stephen PrahDepartment of Agricultural and Resource Economics North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0482-087X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development and dissemination of improved agricultural technologies are crucial for enhancing productivity and the welfare of smallholder farmers. Although there is growing empirical evidence on the impact of improved agricultural technologies on various economic and social outcomes, some studies often overlook potential biases. Stemming from both observable and unobservable characteristics, these biases can result in misleading conclusions. To fill the gap, this study examined the impact of the adoption of improved cassava varieties (ICV) on farm performance and household welfare using a sample of 608 households from 14 rural communities in Ghana. To account for potential biases, the study used appropriate matching algorithm, local average treatment effects and endogenous treatment effects regression. The findings show that ICV adoption has a positive impact on cassava yields, whole-farm land productivity, and household crop incomes. We also show that adopters have significantly lower total annual per capita and food expenditures than non-adopters. Furthermore, adopters were found to spend more on children's education. Thus, policies and strategies aimed at increasing ICV adoption rates could lead to increased land productivity and crop incomes, as well as enhanced food security and higher investment in children's education, particularly for female-headed farm households.

Indexed as

adoptioncassava improved varietiesendogenous treatment effectGhanapropensity score matching

Identifiers

PMID42491411
PMCPMC13377621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.