Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42491390›Full record

ArticleACS environmental Au2026

Using Dose-Additive Models To Predict Exposure and Effects of a Military Site Risk-Relevant PFAS Mixture in Mice.

Andrew G East, Allison M Narizzano, Suma S Thomas, Bharat Chandramouli, Matthew A Bazar, Lindsay A Holden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS environmental Au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew G EastToxicology Directorate, Defense Centers for Public Health-Aberdeen, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21010, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8890-8376
Allison M NarizzanoToxicology Directorate, Defense Centers for Public Health-Aberdeen, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21010, United States.
Suma S ThomasSGS AXYS Analytical Services Ltd., Sidney, British Columbia V8L 5X2, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5514-4288
Bharat ChandramouliSGS AXYS Analytical Services Ltd., Sidney, British Columbia V8L 5X2, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4668-4538
Matthew A BazarToxicology Directorate, Defense Centers for Public Health-Aberdeen, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21010, United States.
Lindsay A HoldenToxicology Directorate, Defense Centers for Public Health-Aberdeen, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21010, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3759-9497

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are widespread environmental contaminants that are largely observed as mixtures. PFAS-focused ecological risk assessments largely assess individual PFAS, but understanding PFAS mixture exposure and potential ecological and biological effects is critical to characterizing real-world risk. To address this, we exposed CD-1 mice to individual PFAS and mixtures of PFAS that are relevant to surveyed environmental media and aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF) used on Department of Defense (DoD) sites. Our study was performed in two parts: (1) assess the whole-body concentration of PFAS and (2) assess tissue compartment concentrations of PFAS (i.e., serum, liver, kidney, and brain). Organ weights and clinical chemistry were collected in the tissue compartment study to measure potential toxicological effects of individual and mixtures of PFAS. Mixed-effect models were used to evaluate how well relationships between dose and body compartments predicted exposure with and without the influence of mixtures. A PFOS-relative weighting factor was evaluated for the potential to predict select effects from dose and tissue concentrations. We apply the laboratory-based finding to a desktop ecological risk assessment scenario and find that while changes in PFAS dietary concentrations may alter exposure and effect estimates, differentiating reference vs impacted sites is difficult. Our results indicate that dose addition methods are successful predictors of PFAS exposure and liver effects and, importantly, provide efficient predictive screening tools for ecological risk assessors evaluating sites' PFAS risks.

Indexed as

exposure estimatehierarchical modelmixturesPFASsmall mammal

Identifiers

PMID42491390
PMCPMC13377515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.