Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42491378›Full record

ArticleAdvances in neural information processing systems2024

Disentangling the Roles of Distinct Cell Classes with Cell-Type Dynamical Systems.

Aditi Jha, Diksha Gupta, Carlos D Brody, Jonathan W Pillow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Stiefel Manifold Dynamical Systems for Tracking Representational Drift.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. No Central Executive? Decision Formation Through Multi-Area Population Dynamics.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aditi JhaElectrical and Computer Engineering, Princeton University.
Diksha GuptaSainsbury Wellcome Center, University College London.
Carlos D BrodyPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University.
Jonathan W PillowPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University.

Funding

Subcortical Neural Coding and DynamicsU19NS104648 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, SAMUEL SHENG-HUNG · 2017 to 2021
$15.3M
Mechanisms of persistent neural activityR01EY033064 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Alexander C Huk, Jonathan William Pillow · 2022 to 2026
$2.6M
Adaptive statistical algorithms for learning and control of neural dynamicsRF1DA056404 · NIDA · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI PARK, IL MEMMING, PILLOW, JONATHAN WILLIAM · 2022 to 2022
$969k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY033064NIDA NIH HHS RF1 DA056404NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS104648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Latent dynamical systems have been widely used to characterize the dynamics of neural population activity in the brain. However, these models typically ignore the fact that the brain contains multiple cell types. This limits their ability to capture the functional roles of distinct cell classes, and to predict the effects of cell-specific perturbations on neural activity or behavior. To overcome these limitations, we introduce the "cell-type dynamical systems" (CTDS) model. This model extends latent linear dynamical systems to contain distinct latent variables for each cell class, with biologically inspired constraints on both dynamics and emissions. To illustrate our approach, we consider neural recordings with distinct excitatory (E) and inhibitory (I) populations. The CTDS model defines separate latents for both cell types, and constrains the dynamics so that E (I) latents have a strictly positive (negative) effects on other latents. We applied CTDS to recordings from rat frontal orienting fields (FOF) and anterior dorsal striatum (ADS) during an auditory decision-making task. The model achieved higher accuracy than a standard linear dynamical system (LDS), and revealed that the animal's choice can be decoded from both E and I latents and thus is not restricted to a single cell-class. We also performed in-silico optogenetic perturbation experiments in the FOF and ADS, and found that CTDS was able to replicate the experimentally observed effects of different perturbations on behavior, whereas a standard LDS model-which does not differentiate between cell types-did not. Crucially, our model allowed us to understand the effects of these perturbations by revealing the dynamics of different cell-specific latents. Finally, CTDS can also be used to identify cell types for neurons whose class labels are unknown in electrophysiological recordings. These results illustrate the power of the CTDS model to provide more accurate and more biologically interpretable descriptions of neural population dynamics and their relationship to behavior.

Identifiers

PMID42491378
PMCPMC13377537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.