ArticleCureus2026
Assessment of Functional Outcomes of Open Carpal Tunnel Release Through the QuickDASH Questionnaire in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: An Observational Retrospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common compressive neuropathy of peripheral nerves. The symptoms include numbness, paresthesia, night pain, and weakness of grip and/or hand function. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are now one of the most effective tools for the assessment of functional outcomes after CTS release. QuickDASH (a shortened, 11-item version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire) has evolved as one of the best questionnaire-based patient-reported outcome measure tools commonly used nowadays. Materials and methods We studied 35 patients from January 2023 to December 2025 at our institute. Diagnosis of CTS was based purely on clinical examinations and neurophysiological studies. The results were assessed and compared using QuickDASH questionnaire scores on two occasions: one preoperatively and another six months post-procedure. Results Patients were predominantly female (88.57%). Most patients were in the 41-60-year age group (51.43%). A total of 94.29% (n = 33) of individuals were right-hand dominant. Hand-specific disease laterality was 20 (57.14%) right hands and 15 (42.86%) left hands out of 35 hands. A total of 77.14% of patients showed a QuickDASH score below 25 at six months post-surgery, whereas 85.72% had scored above 50 during preoperative evaluation. Conclusion The QuickDASH questionnaire is a well-established and convenient tool to assess CTS outcomes. The study suggests that surgical decompression provides excellent improvement and results in all study subjects. However, even within the DASH scores, there is inter-item variability, with some points having better outcomes than others. This must be emphasized during preoperative patient counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.