ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Intersectionality in the lives of people with intellectual disability and their caregivers: insights from a study on respite care in the South African context.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This article advocates for an explicit intersectional lens when conducting research with people with intellectual disability (ID) in South Africa (SA). An intersectional lens spotlights how identity categories, power relations and structures, structural inequities, and disability converge to heighten disadvantage and marginalisation. Methods: This paper engages in a secondary analysis of a doctoral thesis on respite care for persons with ID in SA, a mixed-method, inclusive study entailing interviews, a policy analysis, and a national survey where the integrated data informed service considerations for this disability support service. For this paper, the thesis itself was re-analysed using framework analysis informed by intersectional theory. In doing so, the outputs were reconfigured to expose the intersections of privilege and marginalisation hiding within the broader narrative. Findings: Intersectionality reveals how people with ID and their caregivers in SA experience barriers to accessing quality respite care, affecting health and wellbeing. The lived experience of poor, black people with ID and, especially, their female caregivers is shaped by persisting racial disadvantage arising from interconnected structural inequities, including socio-economic inequality, geographic disparities, gendered care responsibilities, ableism, disablism, disability hierarchies, and cultural concerns, producing layered disadvantage in accessing responsive services. Intersectionality highlights the importance of focussing on the experience of people with ID who encounter particular marginalisations and disadvantage related to their disability. These insights inform recommendations to improve respite care for people with ID and their families. Implications: The paper illustrates the value of this lens, for which intersectional methodologies are needed and can be harnessed in future ID research in SA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.