ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
The "play gap": socioeconomic stratification in pediatric physical activity and its long-term health implications.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physical inactivity in children and adolescents is not only a behavioral problem but also a manifestation of structural inequity. Across countries and within populations, opportunities for physical activity are unequally distributed by sex, socioeconomic position, disability status, neighborhood conditions, and access to supportive social and built environments. As a result, those with the greatest health needs often face the greatest barriers to participation. In this review, we synthesize recent evidence on the determinants of inequity in child and adolescent physical activity, assess the strengths and limitations of major policy levers, and examine emerging intervention strategies designed to improve reach, relevance, and sustainability. We argue that progress will depend on moving beyond universal but weakly implemented recommendations towards equity-oriented approaches that are context-sensitive, cross-sectoral, and accountable for implementation. Schools, financial support mechanisms, urban design, digital tools, and participatory models all hold promises. Still, their effects are constrained when policy ambition is not matched by delivery capacity or when interventions fail to address underlying social gradients. Future progress requires a shift from fragmented programmes to resilient systems that embed equity in design, prioritize disadvantaged groups, strengthen surveillance and evaluation, and position young people and communities as active partners in change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.