ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Physicians' attitudes and perceptions toward the integration of artificial intelligence into pediatric hematology-oncology in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With increasing interest in integrating artificialPrevalence of nasal myiasis in slaughtered camels intelligence (AI) into healthcare in Saudi Arabia, many benefits of using AI for data analysis, pattern recognition, and early disease detection are being recognized by many physicians practicing pediatric hematology-oncology in the country. However, there are concerns regarding AI's limitations, ethical issues, and potential job displacement. This study aimed to explore the attitudes and perceptions of physicians practicing pediatric hematology-oncology in Saudi Arabia toward the use of AI. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia, and included 132 medical doctors. An online questionnaire comprising several structured questions was used for data collection. Results: This study found that 74.2% of physicians had a positive view of the integration of AI into their clinical practice. Physicians' professional title ( Conclusion: Attitudes toward AI among pediatric hematology-oncology physicians are overwhelmingly positive, as they recognize AI's potential to be an efficient and accurate tool in clinical practice. The vast majority of these physicians consider AI to be a complement to human capabilities and emphasize the need for physicians to oversee AI-assisted clinical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.