ArticleOncology letters2026
A nomogram prediction model for brain metastases in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Oncology letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) with brain metastasis (BM) frequently present without central nervous system (CNS) symptoms at initial diagnosis, underscoring the clinical need for early predictive tools. This study aimed to evaluate the role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation subtypes in BM risk and to develop a nomogram prediction model combining EGFR mutation status with serum biomarkers in patients with LUAD. A retrospective cohort of 615 patients with LUAD-401 with BM and 214 without BM, matched by age and sex-was recruited from a single center in China between June 2021 and June 2024. Logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and nomogram modeling were performed, with internal validation via 10-fold cross-validation. Although the overall distribution of EGFR mutations did not differ significantly between BM and non-BM groups, the proportion of exon 19 deletion (19del) mutations was significantly higher in the BM group (P=0.013), with an odds ratio of 2.10 in the univariate analysis, and 19del was confirmed as an independent risk factor in the multivariate analysis. Serum concentrations of neuron-specific enolase, CEA, CA125, CA153 and cytokeratin 19 fragment were markedly elevated in patients with BM (all P<0.0001); ROC analyses stratified by 19del mutation status demonstrated further improvement in predictive performance for selected biomarkers. A nomogram integrating 19del mutation status with the five serum biomarkers achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.835 in the training cohort and a cross-validated AUC of 0.814, with good calibration confirmed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (P=0.151). These findings indicate that LUAD patients harboring EGFR 19del mutations have an elevated BM risk and the combined nomogram provides an effective tool for BM risk stratification in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.