ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Utility of prenatal ultrasound in diagnosis and prognosis of aortic arch obstruction: a 10-year single-center retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the prenatal echocardiographic features, diagnostic accuracy, associated anomalies, and early postnatal outcomes of fetal aortic arch obstruction, with particular emphasis on differentiating interrupted aortic arch from coarctation of the aorta. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 72 cases of aortic arch obstruction over a 10-year period, from 1 June 2014 to 1 June 2024, including interrupted aortic arch (IAA) and coarctation of the aorta (CoA). Prenatal ultrasound and medical records were used to summarize the characteristic ultrasound manifestations, genetic characteristics, and combined malformations, and to track perinatal and clinical outcomes, including postpartum echocardiography or CTA and other imaging examinations, surgical procedures, and prognosis. Results: A total of 72 fetal cases were retrospectively analyzed, including IAA types A, B, and C (22.22, 20.83, and 6.94%, respectively) and CoA (50.00%). The prenatal diagnostic accuracy was 90.28%. The IAA group had significantly smaller aortic valve annulus Z-scores, ascending aorta Z-scores, and aortic-to-pulmonary artery diameter ratios but significantly larger left-to-right ventricular (LV-to-RV) diameter ratios, ventricular septal defect-to-aortic diameter ratios, and ductus arteriosus Z-score compared to CoA ( Conclusion: Prenatal echocardiography is valuable not only for detecting fetal aortic arch obstruction but also for differentiating IAA from CoA and guiding perinatal risk stratification. IAA is associated with more complex intracardiac anomalies, greater ductal dependence, and poorer early outcomes, whereas CoA shows greater clinical heterogeneity and requires close postnatal surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.