ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026
m
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most widespread, abundant, and conserved post-transcriptional modification in eukaryotic RNA, and it participates in the regulation of various biological processes, especially playing a crucial role in tumorigenesis and progression. During tumor progression, abnormal expression of m6A regulatory proteins often leads to dysregulation of m6A modification levels, thereby affecting tumor pathophysiology. Recent studies have shown that in various tumor types, m6A modifications on target mRNAs and non-coding RNA transcripts can regulate the activity of various oncogenic signaling pathways; moreover, m6A modifications can also regulate the tumor glycolysis process through multiple molecular mechanisms, thereby affecting the proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of tumor cells and other biological behaviors. Most existing reviews focus only on the unidirectional regulatory relationships among m6A modification, oncogenic signaling, and glycolysis, while overlooking the crosstalk among the three. To address this gap, this review systematically summarizes the regulatory effects of m6A modifications on key glycolytic enzymes and various cancer signaling pathways, examines in depth the molecular mechanisms by which the three cooperatively participate in tumorigenesis and progression, comprehensively dissects the bidirectional crosstalk among the three core functional modules within this network, and further proposes a self-stabilizing "m6A-signaling-glycolysis closed-loop regulatory network," and provides future research directions for this field. It offers theoretical references for related basic research and clinical diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.