ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Negative affect and psychotic-like experiences in social workers: mechanisms and the buffering role of mindfulness.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Occupational mental health is critical in the high-emotional-labor field of social work. Grounded in the Conservation of Resources (COR) theory, this study investigates the underlying mechanisms linking occupational stress to subclinical psychopathology. Specifically, we propose and test an integrative moderated serial mediation model to explore how Psychotic-like Experiences (PLEs) are statistically associated with Negative Emotion through dual cognitive-affective pathways, and how Mindfulness serves as a vital buffering boundary condition in such associations. Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted among frontline social workers in China. Data were collected from 580 valid respondents utilizing established measurement instruments. The hypothesized theoretical model was rigorously evaluated employing Covariance-Based Structural Equation Modeling (CB-SEM) and bias-corrected bootstrapping techniques (5,000 resamples) via Mplus 8.3 and SPSS 26.0. Results: The empirical results fully supported all 12 proposed hypotheses. Negative Emotion is associated with a cascading "loss spiral" and shows direct statistical correlations with Psychotic-like Experiences. Additionally, Negative Emotion is indirectly linked to PLEs via initial psychological loads (Cognitive Exhaustion and Rumination). These resource-consuming states are further associated with heightened Ego Depletion and interpersonal Loneliness, which are statistically mediated factors in the relationship between negative emotion and psychotic-like experiences. Furthermore, Mindfulness functions as a robust protective resource; it significantly weakens the associative relationships of Ego Depletion, Loneliness, and Negative Emotion with Psychotic-like Experiences in this sample. Conclusions and implications: This study theoretically extends the COR framework into the realm of occupational subclinical psychopathology by delineating a complex, multi-stage resource depletion model based on statistical associations. Practically, the findings underscore the imperative for social work agencies and policymakers to implement systemic emotional support and proactively cultivate practitioners' trait Mindfulness (e.g., via Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction programs) to alleviate resource loss risks, thereby sustaining high-quality social services and practitioners' well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.