Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42490966›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026

Focal volume, steering, and aberration correction in transcranial focused ultrasound: reconsidering the tradeoffs between single-element transducers, phased arrays, and acoustic holograms.

Norman M Spivak, Andrew A E D Bishay, Amber R Hopkins, Bradley S Bohall, Mark E Schafer, Susan Y Bookheimer, Martin M Monti, Alexander Bystritsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Norman M Spivak *Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Andrew A E D Bishay *Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Amber R HopkinsDepartment of Psychology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Bradley S BohallDepartment of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Mark E SchaferRockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States.
Susan Y BookheimerDepartment of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Martin M MontiDepartment of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Alexander BystritskyDepartment of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transducer architecture is an increasingly important design consideration in transcranial focused ultrasound, where focal precision, electronic steering, skull-aberration correction, workflow complexity, and cost must be balanced. Under matched aperture, transmit frequency, focal depth, effective source geometry, and equivalent aberration correction, subdividing an aperture into multiple independently driven elements does not by itself reduce the diffraction-limited focal volume. Phased arrays provide important capabilities that single-element transducers generally lack, including electronic steering, dynamic phase correction, and flexible control of energy deposition. These capabilities can improve the realized intracranial field, particularly when skull-induced aberrations would otherwise broaden, shift, or split the focus. Single-element systems may also be extended through patient-specific acoustic holograms or lenses, which impose spatially varying phase delays to compensate for aberrations, steer the focus, or shape the pressure field. These approaches may reduce system complexity but are typically static and less adaptable than phased arrays. We therefore frame transducer selection as an application-driven design-matching problem: the relevant question is not which architecture is inherently "more focused" under matched conditions, but which best meets a study's requirements for steering, skull-aberration correction, temporal reconfigurability, spatial degrees of freedom, workflow burden, cost, positioning robustness, and safety.

Indexed as

electronic steeringfocused ultrasoundphase correctionskull aberration correctiontransducers

Identifiers

PMID42490966
PMCPMC13375782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.