ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Repeatability and test-retest reliability of thermal and pressure pain threshold testing in healthy thoroughbred horses.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Quantitative sensory testing (QST) has been used in horses to assess nociceptive responsiveness but its broader clinical application is limited by variability across anatomical sites, environmental conditions, operator technique, and behavioral endpoints. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, within-session repeatability, and test-retest reliability of thermal threshold (TT) and pressure pain threshold (PPT) testing in healthy Thoroughbred horses. Methods: Eleven adult Thoroughbred horses (4 mares, 7 geldings; median [IQR] age 6 [5-6] years; body weight 558 ± 47 kg) underwent QST on two occasions 1 week apart. Thermal threshold testing was performed at the nostrils, withers, and coronary band using a handheld contact heat probe (0.6 °C/s ramp; 55 °C cut-off). Pressure pain threshold testing was assessed at the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), seventh rib, and dorsal metacarpophalangeal joint (D-MCP) using a blunt-tipped pressure algometer (2,500 g safety cut-off). Three repeated measurements were collected at each site per session. Within-session repeatability was assessed by coefficient of variation (CV) and test-retest reliability by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), calculated from the average of the two closest of three measurements per session. Results: TT showed moderate to high within-session repeatability (CV 8.9%-13.6%) but poor test-retest reliability at all sites. PPT within-session repeatability was low (CV 34%-57%), with test-retest reliability varying by site: the D-MCP showed moderate reliability, the TMJ fair, and the seventh rib poor. Discussion: Equine QST reliability is strongly influenced by site selection, environmental conditions, behavioral responsiveness, the biological homogeneity of the cohort, which restricted between-subject variance. These findings support QST as a feasible research tool in horses but highlight the need for repeated trials, strict temperature control, and consistent operator technique. Validation in larger, more diverse populations and in horses with naturally occurring pain conditions is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.