Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42490865›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology

Functional/dissociative seizures as a neuroenergetic deficit syndrome: a brain economy failure hypothesis.

Lana Higson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lana HigsonDepartment of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional/dissociative seizures are debilitating and account for up to one-third of presentations to epilepsy monitoring units. Despite this, their pathophysiological mechanism remains poorly understood and available treatments lead to seizure freedom in fewer than half of patients. It is proposed here that functional/dissociative seizures may involve a neuroenergetic deficit syndrome or a brain economy failure where an episodic, insufficient supply of cerebral oxygen is met with an inability of the brain to proactively reorganise the network response. When cerebral oxygen delivery falls below a critical threshold and the brain cannot mount an adaptive reorganisation, neural networks fall sequentially in order of energetic cost, which produces the characteristic symptom profile of functional/dissociative seizures. The subsequent response - convulsions, stiffening, postural collapse - is a physiological rescue mechanism to ensure restoration of cerebral perfusion through skeletal muscle pump activation. This hypothesis accounts for several features of functional/dissociative seizures that are not adequately explained by existing biopsychosocial models. These include the overlap of symptoms with controlled hypoxia; the predominance in females (for the first time linked to documented sex differences in physiological responses to hypoxia); the shift in female-to-male ratio at puberty; the relatively favourable prognosis in paediatric populations; the relapsing-remitting course of the condition; and the heterogeneity of clinical presentations predicted by hub-first, cost-ordered network failure. The paper describes the evidence supporting the hypothesis, its discriminating predictions, and the experimental and clinical approaches for testing it.

Indexed as

cerebral hypoxiadefault mode networkfunctional/dissociative seizuresfunctional neurological disorderictal haemodynamicsneuroenergeticspsychogenic non-epileptic seizuressex differences

Identifiers

PMID42490865
PMCPMC13375510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.