ArticleJournal of clinical medicine research2026
Quantitative Facet Joint Effusion on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Associated With Dynamic Segmental Instability and Pain Severity in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aims of the study were to determine whether quantitatively measured facet joint effusion (FJE) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is associated with dynamic segmental instability and greater pain severity in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS), and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of FJE for identifying unstable segments. Methods: This retrospective single-center study reviewed 151 consecutive DLS patients treated at Qilu Hospital (Qingdao) between January 1, 2020 and June 30, 2024. The cohort included 31 men and 118 women (mean age 64.52 ± 9.76 years). Slipped levels comprised L3 (n = 7), L4 (n = 116), and L5 (n = 28). Patients with prior lumbar surgery, acute spinal trauma, tumor, ankylosing spondylitis, marked scoliosis, multilevel spondylolisthesis, or retrolisthesis were excluded. On axial T2-weighted MRI, the maximal unilateral and bilateral facet effusion thicknesses were measured in millimeters. Dynamic imaging was used to classify segments as stable or unstable. Pain was quantified using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Statistical analyses compared FJE presence and size between stable and unstable segments and assessed diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic area under the curve) and correlations with slip distance and VAS. Results: Seventy-two patients (47.7%) had dynamic segmental instability. FJE was present at 93.1% of unstable levels, with mean effusion thickness of 2.75 ± 0.89 mm, whereas stable levels showed a 26.6% FJE incidence and mean thickness of 1.25 ± 1.25 mm (P < 0.05). Using presence of FJE to identify instability yielded sensitivity 93.1% and specificity 73.4%. Among 88 patients with effusion ≥ 1.0 mm, 76.1% exhibited instability. Effusion thickness correlated linearly with the anteroposterior slip distance difference. Facet joint degeneration grade related nonlinearly to effusion width (increase from grade 1 to 2, decline at grade 3; P < 0.05). ROC AUCs for left and right effusion thickness were 0.9243 and 0.9296, respectively (P < 0.0001). Patients with effusion had higher VAS scores (4.30 ± 1.07 vs. 2.79 ± 0.68, P < 0.05). Conclusions: Millimeter-quantified FJE on MRI was strongly associated with dynamic segmental instability and greater pain severity in DLS. Quantitative FJE demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy and may serve as a practical imaging marker to identify unstable lumbar segments. Given the retrospective design, these results indicate association rather than causation and require prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.