ReviewGastroenterology report2026
Emerging role of intestinal ultrasound in detecting postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease.
Review in Gastroenterology report, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative recurrence remains a major challenge in Crohn's disease (CD), with ileocolonoscopy still considered the reference standard for detecting recurrence and guiding postoperative management. However, repeated endoscopic assessment is invasive, costly, and poorly tolerated, highlighting the need for reliable non-invasive monitoring strategies. Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) has emerged as a promising complementary tool for postoperative surveillance, allowing real-time evaluation of transmural and extramural inflammation. Recent studies and meta-analyses have demonstrated good diagnostic performance of IUS for detecting postoperative recurrence, with pooled sensitivities and specificities reaching 94% and 84%, respectively, while higher bowel wall thickness thresholds (≥5.5 mm) are strongly associated with severe postoperative recurrence. Current evidence supports the integration of IUS with fecal calprotectin, clinical assessment, and endoscopy within a multimodal and risk-adapted follow-up strategy. In particular, IUS may help identify patients requiring closer surveillance, earlier ileocolonoscopy, therapeutic escalation, or additional cross-sectional imaging. Emerging data also suggest that the timing of postoperative IUS assessment is clinically relevant, as very early examinations may be confounded by postoperative inflammatory and remodeling changes. Nevertheless, important limitations remain. No IUS score has yet been specifically validated for postoperative CD anatomy, standardized postoperative-specific thresholds are lacking, and interpretation may be influenced by surgical configuration and operator expertise. This review summarizes the current evidence regarding the role of IUS in postoperative CD, discussing its diagnostic performance, integration with biomarkers and endoscopy, current limitations, and potential role in personalized postoperative monitoring strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.