ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Effects of 6-week high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training on classroom attention in children: a randomized controlled study.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Although physical activity has been shown to enhance children's cognitive and attentional functions, the comparative effects of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training (MICT) on classroom attention behaviors remain unclear. This study compared the effects of 6-week HIIT and MICT interventions on children's classroom attention behaviors using AI-based behavior capture in an ecological environment. Methods: Participants were randomly assigned to HIIT, MICT, or control groups, with interventions integrated into physical education lessons for six weeks. An Intel RealSense multimodal system monitored 760 minutes of core subject classes before and after the intervention. Key attentional behavior markers, including head posture, eye-gaze, blinking, and face detection, were analyzed. Results: Following the 6-week intervention, both exercise groups demonstrated significantly higher overall attentional behavior scores compared to the control group. Inter-group comparisons revealed that the HIIT group significantly outperformed the MICT group in head posture stability, face detection persistence, and overall attention levels (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two exercise groups regarding eye-gaze consistency and blinking frequency (p > 0.05). Discussion: These findings indicate that integrating HIIT or MICT into physical education effectively enhances classroom attention behaviors. However, HIIT provides a greater advantage in maintaining stable physical orientation toward instructional areas of interest. Educators should consider both exercise intensity and movement characteristics when designing physical education activities aimed at promoting classroom attentional engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.