ArticleFrontiers in ophthalmology2026
Changes in higher-order aberrations: toric implantable collamer lens implantation versus ICL combined with limbal relaxing incision.
Article in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the safety, efficacy and changes in corneal aberrations between Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) combined with Limbal Relaxing Incision (LRI) and Toric ICL (TICL) implantation for moderate astigmatism (1.00-1.75 D). Methods: A retrospective study included 30 subjects (46 eyes) assigned to ICL combined with LRI (23 eyes) or TICL (23 eyes) group. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), objective refraction, astigmatism vector analysis were assessed preoperatively and at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively; corneal aberrations were compared preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Results: Both groups showed comparable outcomes in visual acuity, refraction postoperatively. Surgically Induced Astigmatism (SIA) showed a decreasing trend in the LRI group (1.07 to 0.92, P = 0.044), while it remained stable in the TICL group (1.11 to 1.20, P = 0.507). Total corneal wavefront aberrations, spherical aberration and horizontal coma postoperatively showed reduction in LRI group, whereas slightly increased in the TICL group (all P< 0.05). Conclusion: Both ICL combined with LRI and TICL implantation achieve good efficacy in correcting moderate astigmatism. The TICL group showed better postoperative astigmatism stability. The LRI group demonstrated reductions in several corneal aberration parameters compared with the TICL group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.