ArticlePloS one2026
Safety profile of camrelizumab: An analysis based on literature and database review.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveReal-world studies on the safety of camrelizumab are scarce. This study aimed to investigate the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with camrelizumab and evaluate their clinical characteristics and management.
methodsWe retrieved data on ADRs related to the PD-1 inhibitor camrelizumab from the World Health Organization (WHO) adverse event reporting system database (VigiAccess) for the period from June,2019 to July 2025. Additionally, we conducted a retrospective analysis of case reports and case series on camrelizumab-related ADRs published from 2019 to 2025.
results601 ADR reports were included in the VigiAccess database. Asian patients accounted for 99% (597/601), and the majority were male (69%). The most common classification of systemic organs (SOC) is hematological disorders (21.8%), skin reactions (14.3%), and systemic symptoms (8.8%). The main adverse reactions were: Hematological system: bone marrow suppression (10.3%), thrombocytopenia (5.1%); Skin: rash (5.7%), pruritus (4.3%), reactive capillary hyperplasia (RCCEP); systemic: fever (2.6%), chest pain (2.1%); serious events: myocarditis (1.2%), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). Literature analysis included 80 patients (from China), with a median age of 60 years (range 20-84), and 72.5% were male. The main indications are non-small cell lung cancer (20%), nasopharyngeal carcinoma (20%) and hepatocellular carcinoma (11.3%). The median occurrence time of adverse reactions was 8 weeks (ranging from 10 minutes to 88 weeks). Typical ADRs include: cutaneous toxicity (45 cases, 56.3%); RCCEP (32 cases), Stevens-Johnson (SJS)/TEN (5 cases); hematological toxicity (38 cases, 47.5%): bone marrow suppression (22 cases), thrombocytopenia (16 cases); cardiotoxicity (13 cases, 16.25%), mainly myocarditis; Others: immune hepatitis (6 cases), thyroid dysfunction (5 cases).
conclusionThe ADRs of camrelizumab are primarily hematologic and skin toxicities, with a need to be vigilant for late-onset serious events (e.g., myocarditis, TEN). Early identification and corticosteroid intervention are key management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.