Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42490591›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Efficacy and limitations of diffusion-weighted imaging with background suppression-based whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in high-risk prostate cancer staging: A retrospective study.

Nobuyuki Nakajima, Toshiki Kazama, Taro Takahara, Kazuya Oda, Takahiro Ogawa, Meiko Aoki, Sena Ono, Jun Naruse, Kumpei Takahashi, Soichiro Yuzuriha and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Nobuyuki NakajimaDepartment of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6307-032X
Toshiki KazamaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Taro TakaharaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tokai University School of Engineering, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kazuya OdaDepartment of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takahiro OgawaDepartment of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Meiko AokiDepartment of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Sena OnoDepartment of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Jun NaruseDepartment of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kumpei TakahashiDepartment of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Soichiro YuzurihaDepartment of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tatsuya OtakiDepartment of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tatsuya UmemotoDepartment of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0667-325X
Masayoshi KawakamiDepartment of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yoshiaki KawamuraDepartment of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Sunao ShojiDepartment of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the diagnostic performance and limitations of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) using diffusion-weighted imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) for staging high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) in comparison with conventional computed tomography (CT) and bone scintigraphy (BS). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study included 38 patients with newly diagnosed high-risk PCa who underwent CT, bone scintigraphy (BS), and DWIBS, all performed within two months prior to treatment initiation. DWIBS was performed with coverage from the skull base to the proximal femur. Pathological findings from extended pelvic lymph node dissection were available in 14 patients and were used as the reference standard for lymph node metastasis. For all remaining cases and metastatic sites, the reference standard was established by the best valuable comparator consensus of two radiologists and two urologists using imaging and clinical follow-up data.

resultsFor lymph node metastases, both DWIBS and CT demonstrated a sensitivity of 64.3% and a specificity of 100.0%. For bone metastases, DWIBS showed a sensitivity of 88.9% and specificity of 100.0%, whereas BS showed a sensitivity of 100.0% and a specificity of 96.6%. Lung metastases were observed in three patients. Chest CT detected all lesions, whereas DWIBS detected two cases; these were confirmed on coronal T2-weighted images but not visualized on diffusion-weighted imaging alone.

conclusionDWIBS demonstrated acceptable diagnostic performance for staging high-risk PCa, comparable to CT and BS, while offering the advantage of radiation-free WB-MRI and avoidance of radioisotopes. When combined with chest CT, this approach may represent a practical and feasible alternative imaging strategy for initial PCa staging.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsWhole Body ImagingAgedAged, 80 and overBone NeoplasmsHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID42490591
PMCPMC13395373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.