ArticlePloS one2026
Efficacy and limitations of diffusion-weighted imaging with background suppression-based whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in high-risk prostate cancer staging: A retrospective study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the diagnostic performance and limitations of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) using diffusion-weighted imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) for staging high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) in comparison with conventional computed tomography (CT) and bone scintigraphy (BS). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 38 patients with newly diagnosed high-risk PCa who underwent CT, bone scintigraphy (BS), and DWIBS, all performed within two months prior to treatment initiation. DWIBS was performed with coverage from the skull base to the proximal femur. Pathological findings from extended pelvic lymph node dissection were available in 14 patients and were used as the reference standard for lymph node metastasis. For all remaining cases and metastatic sites, the reference standard was established by the best valuable comparator consensus of two radiologists and two urologists using imaging and clinical follow-up data.
resultsFor lymph node metastases, both DWIBS and CT demonstrated a sensitivity of 64.3% and a specificity of 100.0%. For bone metastases, DWIBS showed a sensitivity of 88.9% and specificity of 100.0%, whereas BS showed a sensitivity of 100.0% and a specificity of 96.6%. Lung metastases were observed in three patients. Chest CT detected all lesions, whereas DWIBS detected two cases; these were confirmed on coronal T2-weighted images but not visualized on diffusion-weighted imaging alone.
conclusionDWIBS demonstrated acceptable diagnostic performance for staging high-risk PCa, comparable to CT and BS, while offering the advantage of radiation-free WB-MRI and avoidance of radioisotopes. When combined with chest CT, this approach may represent a practical and feasible alternative imaging strategy for initial PCa staging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.