ArticlePloS one2026
Trends in general practitioner dispensing of thickeners in the NHS England, 2019-24.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOropharyngeal dysphagia is common and often results in aspiration. Thickeners are widely used to thicken liquids to slow the liquid bolus and prevent aspiration and aspiration pneumonia, despite multiple concerns about their use. To date, there is little data on prescribing/dispensing practices. This study aims to provide the first overview of thickener dispensing practices, serve as foundational material for parties interested in research, practice and policy making, and guide further work in this area.
methodWe explored English general practitioner thickener dispensing practices for the five-year period 2019-2024 via the NHS Business Services Authority ePACT2 database and using descriptive statistics and linear regression to analyse the data. We hypothesized that with a large data set, it would be possible to detect trends in dispensing.
resultsBetween 2019 and 2024, nearly three million thickening items were dispensed in primary care in England at a cost of nearly 90 million sterling. Thickened liquids is primarily an intervention for older people although there was a significant decreasing trend in dispensed thickener items in adult populations. Thickener dispensing has increased in the youngest age group (0-1-years-old). The cost of thickeners to the NHS has risen in the last year under study despite the significant decline in use observed for most age groups. Of dispensed items over the five-year period, the vast majority were gum-based.
conclusionWhile the data provided in this study is limited to GP dispensed thickeners in England, it provides researchers, clinicians and policy makers with initial information on dispensing practices. From the available data, a decreasing dispensing trend is seen in the context of rising costs, older people comprise the population who primarily receive thickeners and gum-based products dominate the market. This study raises a number of questions regarding the use of thickeners for people with swallowing problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.