ArticlePloS one2026
Understanding community antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance in Sub-Saharan Africa: A grassroots perspective from Enugu, Nigeria.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing global health crisis, especially in low-and middle-income countries where antibiotic access is insufficiently regulated and health systems are under-resourced. In Sub-Saharan Africa, the community is often the primary site of antibiotics decision-making, shaped by informal markets, structural barriers, and cultural norms. This study investigates antimicrobial use behaviours, perceptions of AMR, and motivations for inappropriate antibiotics use and what might motivate future change, among diverse communities in Nigeria. Using a mixed-methods design, data were collected from a baseline survey (n = 1,281), 20 interviews, and 4 focus group discussions (n = 24). Antibiotic use was widespread, with 57.7% of respondents reporting use within six months, often without prescriptions and for conditions like malaria (32.3%), cough (7.6%), and fever (4.5%), many of which are non-bacterial in origin. Of those who reported antibiotic use, 48% self-medicated, sourcing antibiotics primarily from chemist shops. Misconceptions were common; only 15.7% had heard of AMR, and many confuse it with fake drugs or allergic reactions. Novel trends such as the use of antibiotics for pregnancy termination and preventive "cleansing" emerged. Structural challenges such as poverty, poor healthcare access, and lack of regulation reinforced these behaviours. Qualitative findings highlighted a deep trust in antibiotics as a "cure-all", low health literacy, and the central role of informal drug vendors in care delivery. Participants also offered culturally embedded recommendations, including using radio jingles, community education through religious leaders, and stronger enforcement of drug regulation. This study argues that antibiotic misuse in Nigerian communities is not solely a function of ignorance but a rational response to systemic healthcare limitations, cultural logics, and informal care networks. Tackling AMR in this context requires inclusive, community-informed interventions that address both behavioural and structural determinants of misuse. The study offers actionable insights for AMR policy, communication strategies, and community engagement in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.