ArticleJournal of radiation research2026
The feasibility and toxicity of the second course of boron neutron capture therapy in recurrent head and neck cancer patients.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The feasibility and safety of a second course of boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) are unknown. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the treatment outcomes and toxicities in recurrent head and neck cancer (RHNC) patients who underwent BNCT twice at Southern TOHOKU BNCT Research Center. In total, 33 patients who underwent BNCT twice for RHNC at Southern TOHOKU BNCT Research Center between June 2020 and March 2024 were included. The indications for second BNCT were local recurrence or residual tumor after the first course. Eligible patients either declined salvage surgery or had no curative treatment options other than second BNCT. The median age was 65 years (range, 23-84 years), and the median interval from the first to the second BNCT was 4.1 months (range, 2.3-14.2 months). The median follow-up period after second BNCT was 27.3 months (range, 3.8-60.4 months), and the median survival time after second BNCT was 33.6 months. The 1-year/2-year overall survival and local control after second BNCT were 81.8%/57.1% and 38.3%/22.3%, respectively. The response rates to the first and second courses of BNCT were 81.8% and 70%, respectively. Acute and late Grade 3 or higher toxicities were observed in 5 (15.1%) and 20 patients (60.6%), respectively. Only one patient developed Grade 5 aspiration pneumonia. A second course of BNCT developed a high incidence of late Grade 3 or higher toxicities with limited clinical benefit. Therefore, it may be considered only in carefully selected patients without alternative treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42490531What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.