ArticleJournal of radiation research2026
Dosimetric evaluation of patient-side range shifters using two materials for superficial region treatment in spot scanning proton therapy: impact of material, air gap and setup distance.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the dosimetric characteristics of patient-side range shifters (RS) made of polymethyl methacrylate and high-density polyethylene for superficial region treatment in spot scanning proton therapy. The impact of air gap (AG) size and RS setup deviations on dose accuracy was investigated. A virtual water phantom and a simple volumetric beam arrangement were used for dose calculations in a treatment planning system employing a pencil beam algorithm with a triple Gaussian kernel. Gamma passing rates (GPRs) and point dose measurements were performed using a two-dimensional detector array and an ionization chamber, with AGs ranging from 0 to 110 mm. Results showed that GPRs exceeded 90% at depths of 9, 20 and 50 mm when the AG was within 80 mm, even under 2%/2 mm evaluation criteria. At AGs of 90-110 mm, reduced GPRs and >3% deviations in point dose measurements were observed at shallow depths. Setup deviation experiments were conducted by intentionally shifting the RS slab from the geometry used for reference measurements, and GPRs were evaluated relative to the corresponding measured reference at each original AG. The results indicated that shifts of up to ±10 mm from the reference AG had minimal dosimetric impact, with GPRs remaining above 96.8% under 1%/1 mm criteria. Maintaining the AG within 80 mm is recommended to ensure dosimetric accuracy. These findings suggest that patient-side RS systems can be a practical option in clinical scenarios where nozzle-mounted RS devices are not feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42490513What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.