Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42490444›Full record

ArticleScience advances2026

Curiosity-driven development of action and language in robots through self-exploration.

Theodore J Tinker, Kenji Doya, Jun Tani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Theodore J TinkerOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Okinawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0218-255X
Kenji DoyaOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Okinawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2446-6820
Jun TaniOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Okinawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9131-9206

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infants acquire language with generalization from minimal experience, whereas large language models require billions of training tokens. What underlies efficient development in humans? We investigated this problem through experiments wherein robotic agents learn to perform actions associated with imperative sentences (e.g., push red cube) via curiosity-driven self-exploration. Our approach amortizes active inference using Q-learning, enabling intrinsically motivated developmental learning. The simulations reveal key findings corresponding to observations in developmental psychology. (i) Generalization improves markedly as the scale of compositional elements increases. (ii) Curiosity-driven exploration enables faster learning. (iii) Rote pairing of sentences and actions precedes compositional generalization. (iv) Exception handling induces U-shaped developmental performance, a pattern like representational redescription in child language learning. These results suggest that curiosity-driven active inference accounts for how intrinsically motivated sensorimotor-linguistic learning supports scalable compositional generalization and exception handling in humans and artificial agents.

Indexed as

Exploratory BehaviorLanguageLanguage DevelopmentRoboticsHumansLearning

Identifiers

PMID42490444
PMCPMC13394400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.