ReviewJournal of neurophysiology2026
What Dale never said: multiple incarnations of Dale's law from the birth of pharmacology to modeling brain circuits.
Review in Journal of neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the first half of the 20th century, Sir Henry Dale played a major role in the development of modern pharmacology. Working with several newly identified biologically active substances and simple bioassays, Dale and his colleagues deduced the existence of specific transmitter and hormone receptors. They developed concepts of agonist and antagonist actions, many years before the receptor proteins responsible for the actions of neurotransmitters were purified and characterized. Dale observed that acetylcholine and epinephrine could evoke either excitatory or inhibitory actions on different target tissues and postulated that these same substances were released in the central nervous system. This was turned by other scientists into the first instantiation of Dale's law, which stated that a given neuron only releases one neurotransmitter. In the second half of the 20th century, it became clear that many neurons synthesize and release many cotransmitters that could elicit postsynaptic actions of variable signs and durations, and that the same neuron could be excitatory at some of its targets and inhibitory at others. Today, the theory community often uses the term "Dale's Law" as a short hand for models in which all of the postsynaptic actions of a modeled neuron are exclusively excitatory or inhibitory. Although much can be learned from these models, this constraint should not be considered as a prerequisite for biologically realistic models. Doing so risks overlooking the open questions that have emerged through modern updates to Dale's work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.