Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42490205›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurophysiology2026

What Dale never said: multiple incarnations of Dale's law from the birth of pharmacology to modeling brain circuits.

Gabrielle J Gutierrez, Natasha Baas-Thomas, Eve Marder

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gabrielle J GutierrezNeuroscience and Behavior Department, Barnard College, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2350-1559
Natasha Baas-ThomasVolen Center for Complex Systems and Biology Department, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4711-721X
Eve MarderVolen Center for Complex Systems and Biology Department, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9632-5448

Funding

Neuromodulation and Robustness of Neurons and NetworksR35NS097343 · NINDS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI MARDER, EVE E · 2017 to 2024
$7.8M
Variability and Compensation in Reliable Neuronal NetworksR01MH046742 · NIMH · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI MARDER, EVE E · 1990 to 2025
$7.8M
Effects of Local Adaptation on Parallel Pathway Circuit Computations in the RetinaK22NS104187 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GUTIERREZ, GABRIELLE JACQUELINE · 2018 to 2024
$743k
HHS | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) R01 MH46742HHS | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) K22NS104187HHS | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) R35 NS 097343NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH046742NINDS NIH HHS K22 NS104187NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS097343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the first half of the 20th century, Sir Henry Dale played a major role in the development of modern pharmacology. Working with several newly identified biologically active substances and simple bioassays, Dale and his colleagues deduced the existence of specific transmitter and hormone receptors. They developed concepts of agonist and antagonist actions, many years before the receptor proteins responsible for the actions of neurotransmitters were purified and characterized. Dale observed that acetylcholine and epinephrine could evoke either excitatory or inhibitory actions on different target tissues and postulated that these same substances were released in the central nervous system. This was turned by other scientists into the first instantiation of Dale's law, which stated that a given neuron only releases one neurotransmitter. In the second half of the 20th century, it became clear that many neurons synthesize and release many cotransmitters that could elicit postsynaptic actions of variable signs and durations, and that the same neuron could be excitatory at some of its targets and inhibitory at others. Today, the theory community often uses the term "Dale's Law" as a short hand for models in which all of the postsynaptic actions of a modeled neuron are exclusively excitatory or inhibitory. Although much can be learned from these models, this constraint should not be considered as a prerequisite for biologically realistic models. Doing so risks overlooking the open questions that have emerged through modern updates to Dale's work.

Indexed as

BrainModels, NeurologicalNerve NetPharmacologyAnimalsHistory, 20th CenturyHumansNeuronscotransmissionDalean modelsmulticomponent synaptic potentialsneural network modelsshunting inhibition

Identifiers

PMID42490205
PMCPMC13556283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.