ReviewJournal of behavioral addictions2026
Deep technologies for responsible gambling: A narrative review of policies and implementation strategies.
Review in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Deep technologies, such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, and behavioural analytics, have emerged as promising tools to address complex social challenges. However, their integration into leisure activities, particularly online gambling, has raised concerns over the enhancement of user engagement, which might promote problem gambling behaviours. This review aimed to map how deep technologies intersect with responsible gambling regulations across jurisdictions. Methods: A qualitative scoping review was conducted to synthesise evidence from academic literature, legal and regulatory frameworks, and relevant grey literature. A comparative analysis was performed across key jurisdictions, including the European Union, the United Kingdom, Malta, and selected non-European countries. Results: The review identified very few formal legal instruments that explicitly regulate the use of deep technologies in responsible gambling. The European Union Artificial Intelligence Act introduces binding requirements for high-risk AI systems, including those deployed in gambling, representing a pioneering step toward technology-specific regulation. In contrast, regulatory frameworks beyond Europe were generally non-binding or largely absent, with innovation primarily driven by operators acting voluntarily in the absence of legal mandates. Discussion and conclusions: This analysis underscores persistent gaps in legal oversight and advocates for a shift toward proactive, ethics-based governance models that integrate technological accountability and robust consumer protections. Overall, the findings suggest that regulatory frameworks must not only keep pace with rapid technological innovation but also prioritise prevention through enforceable, transparent, and harmonised policies across jurisdictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.