Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42490094›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2026

Perceiving surface reflectance requires attention.

Erin Goddard, Kavita Paul Remician

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Erin GoddardSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Kavita Paul RemicianSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Color constancy refers to our ability to distinguish changes in surface properties from changes in the properties of light illuminating the scene. The apparent ease with which we can tell that objects do not change in their surface properties, for example, when moving from sunlight to the shade, belies the complexity of solving this ill-constrained problem. Although there is a substantial body of work testing which image cues might be used to accomplish this, there is surprisingly little known about how the brain performs this computation. Here, we tested a fundamental aspect of the perceptual scission of surface reflectance from illuminant/filter properties: whether it requires attention. We measured visual search times for both surface reflectance (requiring separation of surface and illuminant properties) and local tristimulus value (which does not). We found a clear difference between the two: Visual search for color defined by tristimulus value was fast and near-parallel, while search for a particular surface reflectance was slow and consistent with the serial deployment of attention. That is, search times suggest that the perceptual separation of surface and illuminant or filter properties in scenes with spatially heterogeneous illuminants or filters may require an attention-based process analogous to perceiving conjunctions of simple features in "feature binding." These results offer important new insights into the sequence of processes the brain uses to accomplish color constancy.

Indexed as

AttentionColor PerceptionHumansLightingPhotic StimulationSurface Properties

Identifiers

PMID42490094
PMCPMC13401182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.