Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42490053›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026

Fully Automatable Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations with Enhanced Sampling Using FAST/MBAR.

Miroslav Suruzhon, Justina Ratkeviciute, Khaled Abdel-Maksoud, Anna Cavalleri, Michael S Bodnarchuk, Antonella Ciancetta, Ian D Wall, Jonathan W Essex

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Miroslav SuruzhonSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Southampton, Highfield, SouthamptonSO17 1BJ, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-6794-1679
Justina RatkeviciuteSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Southampton, Highfield, SouthamptonSO17 1BJ, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-9745-0777
Khaled Abdel-MaksoudSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Southampton, Highfield, SouthamptonSO17 1BJ, U.K.
Anna CavalleriSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Southampton, Highfield, SouthamptonSO17 1BJ, U.K.
Michael S BodnarchukComputational Chemistry, R&D Oncology, AstraZeneca, CambridgeCB4 0WG, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-9172-1203
Antonella CiancettaSygnature Discovery Limited, BioCity, Pennyfoot St, NottinghamNG1 1GR, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-7612-2050
Ian D WallGSK Medicines Research Centre , Gunnels Wood Road, StevenageSG1 2NY, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-8207-5457
Jonathan W EssexSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Southampton, Highfield, SouthamptonSO17 1BJ, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-2639-2746

Funding

AstraZeneca NAGlaxoSmithKline NASyngenta International NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alchemical free energy (AFE) calculations are a useful tool in computational drug discovery. However, they typically involve relatively short (<10 ns) simulations, meaning that the initial coordinates and, more generally, the setup of the system have a significant effect on the obtained free energy values. To remedy this, we recently developed a fully adaptive version of the simulated tempering algorithm (FAST) and applied it in the context of sampling. In this work, we extend FAST to AFE calculations with and without enhanced sampling of a particular degree of freedom of interest (FAST/MBAR). We show that enhanced sampling significantly increases the mobility of the targeted degree of freedom at the cost of reduced sampling efficiency over λ space. On the other hand, the free energy calculations without explicit targeting of certain degrees of freedom retain initial-coordinate bias over longer time scales. Despite this, both protocols readily explore nanosecond-time-scale events, such as torsional rotation, due to the single-trajectory nature of FAST, making them less sensitive to the system preparation. It is shown that the robust automated nature of FAST/MBAR makes it a competitive alternative to conventional AFE methods.

Identifiers

PMID42490053
PMCPMC13472099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.