ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026
Fully Automatable Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations with Enhanced Sampling Using FAST/MBAR.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alchemical free energy (AFE) calculations are a useful tool in computational drug discovery. However, they typically involve relatively short (<10 ns) simulations, meaning that the initial coordinates and, more generally, the setup of the system have a significant effect on the obtained free energy values. To remedy this, we recently developed a fully adaptive version of the simulated tempering algorithm (FAST) and applied it in the context of sampling. In this work, we extend FAST to AFE calculations with and without enhanced sampling of a particular degree of freedom of interest (FAST/MBAR). We show that enhanced sampling significantly increases the mobility of the targeted degree of freedom at the cost of reduced sampling efficiency over λ space. On the other hand, the free energy calculations without explicit targeting of certain degrees of freedom retain initial-coordinate bias over longer time scales. Despite this, both protocols readily explore nanosecond-time-scale events, such as torsional rotation, due to the single-trajectory nature of FAST, making them less sensitive to the system preparation. It is shown that the robust automated nature of FAST/MBAR makes it a competitive alternative to conventional AFE methods.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.