Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42490033›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2026

Multimodal features and prognostic risk assessment in locally advanced gastric cancer patients following neoadjuvant therapy based on machine learning algorithms: a multicenter study.

Li Liu, Qing Zhong, Caiming Weng, Lihong Chen, Yuqin Sun, Shichao Wu, Minxian Zhuang, Wen Li, Guojun Xia, Zhixin Shangguan and 7 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Li Liu *Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Qing Zhong *Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Caiming Weng *Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Lihong Chen *Department of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Yuqin SunDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China.
Shichao WuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Hospital of Putian City, Putian, Fujian Province, China.
Minxian ZhuangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Wen LiDepartment of Pathology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Guojun XiaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shaoxing Central Hospital, Shaoxing, China.
Zhixin ShangguanDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Dong WuDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Chaohui ZhengDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Jianwei XieDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Qiyue ChenDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Lisheng CaiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China.
Changming HuangDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Ping LiDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China. pingli811002@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9418-9339

Funding

Medical Innovation Project of Fujian Province No.2025XH048National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 82403647This research was supported by Fujian Research and Training Grants for Young and Middle-aged Leaders in Healthcare No.【2022】954
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is recommended for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC), but some patients respond poorly. We aimed to construct a multimodal model integrating CT images, transcriptomic sequencing, and clinicopathological data to assess prognosis in LAGC patients receiving NAT. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis multicenter study included 505 LAGC patients who underwent NAT. Radiomic features were extracted from preoperative CT images of 505 patients. RNA-seq was performed on 277 post-NAT specimens, with additional data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases (n = 804). Patients were divided into training (168 cases), internal validation (72 cases), and external validation cohorts. Machine learning algorithms identified key radiomic, molecular, and clinical features associated with NAT response, which were then integrated into a multimodal model to predict overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

resultsSix radiomic and three molecular features significantly associated with NAT response were selected. Radiomic risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.0, P < 0.001) and molecular risk (HR: 7.1, P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors. By integrating radiomic risk, molecular risk, and clinical characteristics, a multimodal model (MuMo) was constructed.The C-index results (OS, C-index = 0.855; DFS, C-index = 0.786) demonstrated that MuMo outperformed the single-modality models and ypTNM staging.Mechanistic analysis suggested that the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy was significantly enriched in immune-inflammatory pathways.

conclusionsMuMo can effectively predict postoperative survival risk in LAGC patients receiving NAT, serving as a powerful tool for optimizing prognostic assessment.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeoadjuvant TherapyStomach NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisRadiomicsRisk AssessmentSurvival RateTomography, X-Ray ComputedGastric cancerMachine learningMuMoNeoadjuvant therapyPrognostic risk

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.