ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2026
Emissions from a diesel engine with an air intake system under obstructed conditions.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Incomplete combustion in internal combustion engines leads to efficiency losses and increases in pollutant emission levels. For combustion to be complete, a well-balanced air-fuel mixture is essential, and this balance depends on the characteristics of the air intake system. In this context, the present study investigated the effect of five restriction levels (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80%) applied to the air intake duct on diesel engine emissions. To this end, a 75-hp tractor was coupled to an AW Nebraska 800 dynamometer, and gaseous emissions (oxygen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen oxides) were recorded at five engine speeds (1250, 1500, 1750, 2000, and 2250 rpm). The relationship between intake system restriction and combustion quality was assessed, and mild restrictions (up to 20%) promoted more complete combustion under the evaluated operating conditions, as indicated by lower residual oxygen and carbon monoxide concentrations and higher carbon dioxide levels in the exhaust. In contrast, the 60% restriction produced the lowest NOx concentration. Regarding engine speed, higher engine speeds (1500 to 2250 rpm) favored more efficient combustion, with lower oxygen and carbon monoxide levels and higher CO₂ and NOx concentrations. Thus, restricting airflow was found to significantly alter the emissions profile, making it crucial to optimize air intake to balance efficiency and pollutant control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.