ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2026
Early prophylactic anticoagulation in patients with severe sepsis-associated thrombocytopenia: a target trial emulation.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe sepsis-associated thrombocytopenia creates a difficult clinical trade-off between thrombosis prevention and bleeding risk, yet evidence to guide pharmacological prophylaxis when platelet counts are 30,000-50,000/µL remains limited. We conducted a target trial emulation using the MIMIC-IV database, classifying eligible adults with sepsis upon first intensive care unit admission based on whether a predominantly unfractionated heparin (UFH)-based prophylaxis strategy was administered within a 24-hour grace period after platelet counts initially entered this range. Among 938 eligible patients (189 prophylaxis strategy, 749 control strategy), venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurred in 14 and 86 patients, respectively. In the inverse probability-weighted Cox analysis, early administration of this UFH-based prophylaxis was associated with a lower 28-day VTE hazard (adjusted hazard ratio 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.92; P = 0.025), though this association was attenuated in certain prespecified sensitivity analyses. Electronic health record-derived major bleeding occurred in 22 and 95 patients, respectively, and no statistically higher hazard was observed under the prophylactic strategy (adjusted hazard ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.46-1.20; P = 0.220). These findings suggest that early administration of a predominantly UFH-based prophylactic strategy may be associated with a lower VTE risk, without a statistically higher hazard of the electronic health record-derived major bleeding endpoint. Given the observational design, this efficacy signal remains hypothesis-generating rather than definitive and warrants prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42489962What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.