ArticleDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Treatment of mast cell-mediated angioedema].
Article in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mast cell-mediated angioedema represents the most common form of angioedema and may occur either in isolation or in association with urticaria. Clinically, the spectrum ranges from anaphylactic or anaphylactoid reactions, such as those occurring in allergic conditions, to chronic recurrent disease courses, for example, in the context of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Beyond classical IgE-mediated reactions observed in allergic diseases, it is now recognized that these conditions, as well as pseudoallergic reactions and chronic disorders such as CSU, are driven by more complex immunological mechanisms. In the treatment of acute mast cell-mediated angioedema, modern non-sedating second-generation H1 antihistamines remain the cornerstone of therapy. In patients at risk of anaphylaxis (e.g., in the setting of an allergic reaction), current guideline recommendations additionally include the use of glucocorticoids and epinephrine. The management of chronic spontaneous urticaria continues to follow a stepwise treatment algorithm; however, this approach has recently been expanded. In patients who fail to respond to second-generation H1 antihistamines (even at doses up to four times the standard dose), omalizumab, dupilumab, and remibrutinib may now be prescribed as add-on therapies (with dupilumab being indicated only in patients who have not previously received anti-IgE therapy). Additional therapeutic strategies, including anti-KIT monoclonal antibodies, are currently under clinical investigation. In contrast, no new therapeutic options have yet received regulatory approval for mast cell-mediated angioedema associated with chronic inducible urticaria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42489912What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.