ArticleBioprocess and biosystems engineering2026
Influences of light quality on the flashing light effect to enhance growth and CO
Article in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microalgal CO₂ fixation is a promising strategy for industrial carbon capture, yet its application remains limited by inefficient light utilization. Although the flashing light effect has been explored as a light-management strategy for improving photon utilization in microalgal cultivation, its effectiveness depends on spectral composition, flashing frequency, duty cycle, and cultivation conditions. In this study, light quality, including red (R), blue (B), white (W), and mixed red-blue (RB) light, and PWM flashing parameters, including frequency (10-1000 Hz) and duty cycle (30%-90%), were manipulated to evaluate their effects on the growth, chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics, biomass-based apparent CO₂ fixation, biochemical composition, and antioxidant responses of Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Under the cultivation conditions, mixed red-blue light (R: B = 1:5) combined with 200 Hz flashing and a 50% duty cycle increased biomass yield by 58%, biomass-based apparent CO₂ fixation rate by 60%, and lipid yield by 41.9% relative to the continuous white-light reference. These responses were accompanied by improved PSII photochemical performance and coordinated antioxidant responses, suggesting that the optimized red-blue PWM regime helped maintain a more favorable balance between photochemical energy conversion and downstream biomass formation under the tested conditions. Overall, these results provide evidence that spectral optimization combined with PWM flashing illumination can improve the cultivation performance of Chlorella pyrenoidosa, offering physiological insights for light-management strategies and high-performance photobioreactor design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42489878What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.