Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42489873›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2026

Two distinct modes of ocular drift observed during figure-ground perception.

August Romeo, Maria Solé Puig, Hans Supèr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

August RomeoDepartment of Cognition, Development and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Pg. Valld´Hebron 171, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Maria Solé PuigDepartment of Cognition, Development and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Pg. Valld´Hebron 171, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Hans SupèrDepartment of Cognition, Development and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Pg. Valld´Hebron 171, 08035, Barcelona, Spain. hans.super@icrea.cat.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precise coordination between neurons and cortical areas is crucial for sensory perception, yet in vision, continuous fixational eye movements constantly shift retinal input. Traditionally considered random, these drifts modulate neural activity and may challenge the temporal precision needed for perceptual integration, particularly given their partial interocular independence. Recent evidence suggests that ocular drifts are not purely stochastic and play an active role in visual processing. Here, we investigated the impact of fixational eye movements on visual perception using a figure-ground segmentation task. Participants maintained central fixation while viewing textures composed of oriented line segments and reported the presence or absence of a centrally embedded figure. We simultaneously recorded binocular drift and microsaccades, analyzing interocular coordination through 2D cross-correlograms of angular velocities. We found that figure-presents trials exhibited narrow peaks in interocular correlation, while figure-absent trials showed broader, less synchronized drift patterns. Microsaccades were observed to facilitate drift alignment across the eyes. The decrease in microsaccade rate in figure-present trials may contribute to the change in drift synchrony, but it is not required for it. Changes in eye synchrony are also observed under monocular viewing conditions, whereas variations in accommodation and pupil size appear to be unrelated. These results identify two distinct ocular drift modes associated with different perceptual outcomes. Our findings suggest that ocular drift operates under closed-loop control and contributes to effective visual processing.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsFixation, OcularPattern Recognition, VisualSaccadesVision, BinocularVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultEye synchronyFixational eye movementMicro saccadePerception

Identifiers

PMID42489873
PMCPMC13396028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.