ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Two distinct modes of ocular drift observed during figure-ground perception.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precise coordination between neurons and cortical areas is crucial for sensory perception, yet in vision, continuous fixational eye movements constantly shift retinal input. Traditionally considered random, these drifts modulate neural activity and may challenge the temporal precision needed for perceptual integration, particularly given their partial interocular independence. Recent evidence suggests that ocular drifts are not purely stochastic and play an active role in visual processing. Here, we investigated the impact of fixational eye movements on visual perception using a figure-ground segmentation task. Participants maintained central fixation while viewing textures composed of oriented line segments and reported the presence or absence of a centrally embedded figure. We simultaneously recorded binocular drift and microsaccades, analyzing interocular coordination through 2D cross-correlograms of angular velocities. We found that figure-presents trials exhibited narrow peaks in interocular correlation, while figure-absent trials showed broader, less synchronized drift patterns. Microsaccades were observed to facilitate drift alignment across the eyes. The decrease in microsaccade rate in figure-present trials may contribute to the change in drift synchrony, but it is not required for it. Changes in eye synchrony are also observed under monocular viewing conditions, whereas variations in accommodation and pupil size appear to be unrelated. These results identify two distinct ocular drift modes associated with different perceptual outcomes. Our findings suggest that ocular drift operates under closed-loop control and contributes to effective visual processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.