Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42489745›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of nutrition2026

Distinct effects of supplementation with resistant starch and polydextrose on plasma and faecal bile acid profile and associations with gut microbiota: a randomised, controlled intervention in healthy participants.

Jiemin Fan, Gwenaelle le Gall, Fiona C Malcomson, Panayiotis Louca, Lauren Beck, Andrew Nelson, Naomi D Willis, Iain McCallum, Long Xie, Arthur C Ouwehand and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01214681 (Chemoprevention of Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01214681 naunknown statusnot on this map

Chemoprevention of Colorectal Cancer: the Role of Non-digestible Carbohydrates

TypeinterventionalSponsorNewcastle UniversityRan2010 to 2012Enrolled75ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsMaltodextrin and Amioca starch, Hi-maize 260, Polydextrose, Hi-maize 260 and polydextrose
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jiemin FanHuman Nutrition and Exercise Research Centre, Centre for Healthier Lives, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3186-8315
Gwenaelle le GallFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1379-2196
Fiona C MalcomsonHuman Nutrition and Exercise Research Centre, Centre for Healthier Lives, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5072-7644
Panayiotis LoucaHuman Nutrition and Exercise Research Centre, Centre for Healthier Lives, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5956-1433
Lauren BeckTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8470-9679
Andrew NelsonDepartment of Applied Science, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6665-4929
Naomi D WillisHuman Nutrition and Exercise Research Centre, Centre for Healthier Lives, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Iain McCallumNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Tyneside General Hospital, Rake Lane, North Shields, NE29 8NH, UK.
Long XieHuman Nutrition and Exercise Research Centre, Centre for Healthier Lives, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2138-888X
Arthur C OuwehandIFF Health, 02460, Kantvik, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8348-0633
Julian D StowellSabri Ülker Foundation, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4273-5824
Seamus B KellyNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Tyneside General Hospital, Rake Lane, North Shields, NE29 8NH, UK.
Michael BradburnNorthumbria Healthcare National Health Service Foundation Trust, Ashington, NE63 9JJ, UK.
Nigel J BelshawFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
Ian T JohnsonQuadram Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7UQ, UK.
Christopher J StewartTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6033-338X
Michael MüllerFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5930-9905
Bernard M CorfeHuman Nutrition and Exercise Research Centre, Centre for Healthier Lives, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK. Bernard.Corfe@newcastle.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0449-2228
John C MathersHuman Nutrition and Exercise Research Centre, Centre for Healthier Lives, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3406-3002

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H005013/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDietary fibre may influence bile acid (BA) metabolism via interactions with gut microbiota. We hypothesised that dietary fibres with distinct fermentative properties, resistant starch (RS) and polydextrose (PD), would differentially alter BA profiles in plasma and faeces through gut microbiota-mediated mechanisms.

methodsBA profiles were analysed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry in plasma (n = 74) and faeces (n = 50) from a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled 2 × 2 factorial trial. Healthy participants consumed 23 g/day Hi-maize

resultsSupplementation with RS, but not PD, increased a range of conjugated BAs and deoxycholic acid (FDR < 0.05). Concentrations of taurochenodeoxycholic acid (FDR = 0.027) and taurine conjugated BAs (FDR = 0.049) in plasma correlated positively with Akkermansia abundance in response to RS. Although neither RS nor PD altered BA concentrations in faeces, RS decreased (p = 0.032) and PD increased (p = 0.012) faecal proportions of primary BAs. PD reduced secondary BA transformation ratios (p < 0.05), along with shifts in related microbial associations. There were negative correlations between plasma primary conjugated BAs and faecal secondary BAs in response to RS specifically (p < 0.05).

conclusionRS increased plasma BAs, particularly conjugated BAs, whereas PD reduced faecal secondary BA transformation. The distinct impacts of RS and PD on BA profiles and fibre-specific microbial associations may underlie their differential metabolic effects. Trail registration The DISC Study was registered with https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (Identifier NCT01214681) in 2010.

Indexed as

Bile Acids and SaltsDietary SupplementsFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGlucansResistant StarchStarchAdultDietary FiberDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultBile Acids and SaltsDietary FiberGlucanspolydextroseResistant StarchStarchBile acidGut microbiotaPolydextroseResistant starch

Identifiers

PMID42489745
PMCPMC13396052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.