ArticleEuropean journal of histochemistry : EJH2026
Histopathological evaluation of RPL5 expression in triple-negative breast cancer: an integrated immunohistochemical and transcriptomic study.
Article in European journal of histochemistry : EJH, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer characterized by high invasiveness, limited therapeutic options, and unfavorable clinical outcomes. Ribosomal protein L5 (RPL5), a component of the large ribosomal subunit, has been implicated in ribosome biogenesis, translational regulation, and p53-associated cellular processes. This study investigated the immunohistochemical expression pattern of RPL5 in TNBC tissues and explored its potential biological significance through integrated transcriptomic analyses. Tumor tissues from 37 patients with TNBC and 7 adjacent non-tumorous breast tissues were collected from the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University between December 2017 and December 2023. RPL5 protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry, and its association with clinicopathological characteristics was analyzed. Public transcriptomic datasets from TCGA-BRCA and GEO were further used to validate RPL5 expression patterns in TNBC. Co-expression analysis and Gene Ontology (GO)/Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses were performed to investigate potential biological functions and signaling pathways associated with RPL5. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated significantly lower RPL5 protein expression in TNBC tissues compared with adjacent normal breast tissues (p=0.001). In contrast, transcriptomic analyses revealed significantly higher RPL5 expression in TNBC compared with non-TNBC breast cancer subtypes (p<0.001). No significant associations were observed between RPL5 expression and clinicopathological parameters, including age, tumor size, menopausal status, TNM stage, histological grade, or lymph node metastasis (all p>0.05). Survival analysis showed no significant difference in overall survival between patients with high and low RPL5 expression. Functional enrichment analyses indicated that RPL5-related genes were predominantly involved in ribosome biogenesis, translational regulation, and p53-related signaling pathways. These findings suggest that abnormal RPL5 expression may be associated with TNBC biology through ribosome-related programs, although causal roles require functional validation. RPL5 may represent a potential histopathological and molecular indicator associated with TNBC biology, although its precise functional role requires further experimental validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.