ArticleJournal of virology2026
Distinct modes of RNA degradation by the structurally related coronavirus and arenavirus exoribonucleases.
Article in Journal of virology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coronaviruses and arenaviruses encode evolutionarily related DEDDh-family 3'-5' exoribonuclease (ExoN) domains, which support the replication of their RNA genomes and evasion of the host's antiviral immunity. Here, we report comparative biochemical analyses of SARS-CoV-2 and Lassa virus (LASV) ExoN, which show that the two enzymes have distinct characteristics despite structural conservation and their shared preference for double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) substrates. SARS-CoV-2 nsp14/10 exhibits a highly processive behavior and tends to remove many nucleotides upon each binding event. By contrast, LASV NP-ExoN exhibits a less processive behavior and removes fewer nucleotides upon each binding event. The two enzymes also show a difference in the minimal dsRNA length for efficient degradation. We show that nsp14/10 associates with a dsRNA substrate at a faster rate than NP-ExoN and correspondingly has a higher affinity for dsRNA, which is likely to account for the higher processivity. These observations help to understand the biological functions of the viral ExoN enzymes and underscore roles for nsp14/10 beyond proofreading. IMPORTANCE: Coronaviruses such as SARS-CoV-2 and arenaviruses such as Lassa virus (LASV) share a structurally similar exoribonuclease (ExoN) domain as part of the viral non-structural protein 14 (nsp14) and nucleoprotein (NP), respectively, which degrades RNA strands from the 3' terminus. The ExoN activity of coronavirus nsp14 is known for its role in proofreading, where it removes nucleotides misincorporated during viral RNA synthesis, whereas that of arenavirus NP is known for its importance in suppressing the host's immune response by degrading immunostimulatory RNAs. In this study, we show that SARS-CoV-2 ExoN is highly processive and removes many nucleotides upon each binding event, whereas LASV NP ExoN is less processive and removes fewer nucleotides at a time. We further show that the contrasting behaviors are attributable to distinct RNA-binding kinetics of these two viral enzymes. These observations help to understand the biological roles of the viral ExoN enzymes and suggest their pleiotropic functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.