ArticleThe journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research2026
Risk Stratification for Postpartum Hemorrhage in Vaginal Delivery: A Nationwide Cohort Study of Predelivery and Intrapartum Risk Assessment.
Article in The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo develop and validate machine learning models for clinically applicable risk stratification of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) in vaginal delivery, and to assess whether incorporating intrapartum information improves detection while maintaining a similar screening burden.
methodsThis nationwide retrospective cohort study included 1 224 990 women undergoing vaginal delivery at secondary and tertiary care institutions in Japan between 2014 and 2023. Data from 2014 to 2022 were used for model development, and 2023 was reserved for temporal external validation. Machine learning models were developed using routinely available predelivery clinical variables, with additional intrapartum information incorporated into an updated model. A predefined alert-rate threshold was selected in the development cohort to maximize sensitivity while maintaining approximately 300 high-risk classifications per 1000 deliveries. Performance was assessed using clinically interpretable metrics per 1000 deliveries.
resultsPPH (blood loss ≥ 1000 mL) occurred in 7.5% overall and 9.7% in the validation cohort. In temporal external validation, the predelivery model identified 52.2 PPH cases per 1000 deliveries (sensitivity 0.537) with 302.5 high-risk classifications. The intrapartum model identified 57.7 cases (sensitivity 0.596) with 320.1 classifications. Thus, intrapartum updating detected approximately 5-6 additional PPH cases per 1000 deliveries with a modest increase in screening burden. Discrimination improved from 0.676 to 0.703.
conclusionsMachine learning models using routinely available clinical information may support screening and preparedness for PPH in vaginal delivery. Incorporating intrapartum information modestly improved detection while maintaining a similar alert burden, supporting its potential clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.